Helonic is an AI construction drawing analysis platform for teams researching templates during drawing review. Free RFI template and RFI log template for construction, with sheet-referenced example questions and a response format. Download both CSVs for Excel.
An RFI template is a standard form for asking the design team a written question about the contract documents, with fields for the drawing and spec references, a suggested answer, cost and schedule impact, and the response. This page gives you two downloads: an RFI form template and an RFI log template for tracking every RFI on the job.
A complete construction RFI form has: RFI number, date, to and from, subject, spec section, drawing sheet and detail reference, the question, a suggested solution, cost impact (Y/N), schedule impact (Y/N), date response required, the response, who responded, and the date answered. The log repeats the key fields one row per RFI and adds status and days open.
These fields cover what AIA G716 asks for (references researched, sender's recommendation, requested reply date) plus the impact flags most GCs add. The example follows one RFI about a duct and beam conflict on a medical office building.
| Field | What to enter | Example |
|---|---|---|
| RFI # | Sequential number, never reused. | RFI-052 |
| Date | Date sent. | September 28, 2026 |
| To / From | Recipient (usually the architect) and sender, with firms. | To: D. Marlow, Marlow Architects / From: K. Shah, Keystone Builders |
| Subject | Short, searchable title naming the element and location. | Supply duct vs W12 beam, Level 3 corridor, grid C/5 |
| Spec section | The CSI MasterFormat section involved. | 23 31 13 Metal Ducts |
| Drawing / sheet + detail ref | Every sheet and detail you checked. | M-301 (duct 24x14 at 10'-6″ BOD), S-301 (W12x26 BOS 11'-2″), A-501 detail 4 |
| Question | One question, answerable in one response. | Can the 24x14 supply duct be resized to 36x10 and lowered to pass under the beam, or should it reroute? |
| Suggested solution | Your proposed answer, with any cost or time it carries. | Resize to 36x10 at 10'-2″ BOD between grids C/4 and C/6; ceiling at 9'-6″ per A-701 still clears; no added cost |
| Cost impact (Y/N) | Your best read, not a claim. | N |
| Schedule impact (Y/N) | Whether the answer delays work, and when. | Y if not answered by 10/09 (L3 duct rough-in) |
| Date response required | Date the answer is needed to hold the schedule. | October 9, 2026 |
| Response | The design team's answer, with any sketch or revised sheet. | Resize to 36x10 at 10'-2″ BOD as proposed. See SK-M-014. |
| Responder | Name and firm. | L. Tran, PE, Halvorsen MEP |
| Date answered | Date the response was returned. | October 6, 2026 |
The difference is references and a single, answerable question. A bad RFI forces the architect to go find the problem before they can answer it.
| Bad RFI | Good RFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ductwork conflict | Supply duct vs W12 beam, Level 3 corridor, grid C/5 |
| References | None | M-301, S-301, A-501 detail 4; spec 23 31 13 |
| Question | Ductwork doesn't fit in corridor ceiling. Please advise. | M-301 shows a 24x14 supply duct at 10'-6″ BOD, so its top sits at 11'-8″; S-301 shows the W12x26 at 11'-2″ BOS. Can the duct be resized to 36x10 and lowered to 10'-2″ BOD between grids C/4 and C/6, or should it reroute? |
| Suggested solution | Blank | Resize to 36x10 (larger cross-section than 24x14); ceiling at 9'-6″ still clears; no added cost |
| Required by | ASAP | October 9, 2026 (L3 duct rough-in) |
The log is one row per RFI, sorted by number, and it's the document the owner and architect look at in every OAC meeting. Keep it lean enough to fit on one printed page width.
| Field | What to enter | Example |
|---|---|---|
| RFI # | Matches the form. | RFI-052 |
| Subject | Same subject line as the form. | Supply duct vs W12 beam, L3 corridor, C/5 |
| Sheet / spec ref | Primary sheet and section. | M-301 / 23 31 13 |
| Originator | Who raised it (GC, sub, or owner). | Summit Mechanical via Keystone |
| Assigned to | Who must answer. | Marlow Architects (to Halvorsen MEP) |
| Date sent | 9/28/2026 | |
| Date required | 10/9/2026 | |
| Date answered | 10/6/2026 | |
| Days open | Date answered (or today) minus date sent. | 8 |
| Status | Draft, Open, Answered, Closed, or Void. | Closed |
| Cost / schedule impact | Y or N for each, from the response. | N / N |
| Resulting document | ASI, bulletin, CCD, or change order number if the answer changed scope. | SK-M-014, no CO |
Download the RFI form template (CSV, opens in Excel or Google Sheets) and download the RFI log template (CSV, opens in Excel or Google Sheets). Each has the header row above and the RFI-052 example row.
A good RFI response answers the exact question, cites the sheet or sketch that shows the answer, and states whether it changes cost or time. If the answer changes the work, it should say what document will follow: an ASI, a bulletin, or a change order.
Remember that an RFI reply alone doesn't authorize extra cost or time. AIA G716 says as much: if the answer changes the contract documents, a change order, construction change directive, or minor change has to be issued. When that happens, carry the RFI number into the change order template so the two stay linked.
This page is the form and the log. For the writing technique in depth, read how to write an RFI; for aging reports and follow-up cadence, read how to track RFIs. To put a number on your RFI volume, try the RFI cost calculator.
Helonic finds the drawing conflicts that become RFIs, like the duct and beam conflict above, by reading the full PDF set across disciplines. With RFI generation, you pick which findings to keep, and it drafts each RFI with a subject, description, sheet reference, and suggested response, then exports to PDF or Excel or pushes drafts to Procore or Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud). The PDF to RFI workflow walks through it end to end.
Milind is the co-founder and CEO of Helonic, where he leads product and go-to-market for AI-powered construction drawing analysis. He works closely with general contractors, project managers, estimators, and owners to understand how drawing quality drives project outcomes - and where AI can reduce RFIs, change orders, and rework. Milind has interviewed hundreds of construction professionals across project delivery roles, from preconstruction estimators at ENR top-400 contractors to facilities directors at institutional owners, and uses those conversations to shape both product direction and the way Helonic talks about the work.
How this page was researched: RFI form fields were checked against AIA's published instructions and public sample for G716-2004 Request for Information (help.aiacontracts.com and aiacontracts.com, checked November 1, 2026). Helonic's RFI drafting and export capabilities were checked against the /features/rfi-generation and /features/autodesk-integration pages on helonic.com the same day. The duct and beam example is illustrative.
Last reviewed by Milind Sagaram · November 1, 2026
Related guides, comparisons, and features for coordination teams.