The most common errors in electrical panel schedules and a checklist for catching them at review
Panel schedules are how electrical loads get organized, sized, and protected. A bad panel schedule produces nuisance tripping, AIC mismatches that fail inspection, and code violations that are expensive to fix after installation. Most electrical drawing review starts at the panel schedule because errors there cascade into every other electrical drawing.
Demand factors permit conductors and OCPD to be sized for the load expected to run simultaneously, not the connected load. NEC defines demand factors by occupancy and load type (dwelling lighting, motors, kitchen equipment, electric range, etc.). The two most common errors are applying demand factors where the code does not allow them (e.g., commercial continuous lighting), and failing to apply them where the code does allow them, resulting in oversized services.
Use a checklist that requires the reviewer to trace each labeled device on the lighting and power plans back to its circuit on the panel schedule, and each circuit on the panel schedule back to a device on the plans. The two-way trace catches both phantom circuits and orphan loads neither of which is visible if you only review one direction.
Continuous loads (operating 3 hours or more) require conductors and OCPD sized at 125% of the load per NEC 210.19 and 210.20. Common continuous loads include commercial lighting, electric signage, and continuous-duty equipment. Failing to apply the 1.25 multiplier is one of the most frequent panel schedule errors caught in plan review.
More guides on electrical drawing review and code compliance.