Helonic

Area of Refuge Two-Way Communication on Life Safety Plans

Helonic is an AI construction drawing analysis platform for teams researching life safety during drawing review.

IBC areas of refuge need a two-way communication system at the landing. Many life safety plans show the refuge and omit the phone.

Life SafetySeptember 24, 2026

An area of refuge on a life safety plan needs a two-way communication system at the landing when the IBC requires the refuge. Helonic looks for the refuge symbol and the matching communication device on the electrical or life safety sheet. Exit sign placement stays on the life safety review. This page is only the communication system.

What has to be on the drawing?

IBC Section 1009 sends you to the communication requirements. The sheet should show where the device is, where it calls, and that the stair or elevator landing can hold the wheelchair space.

  • A marked area of refuge at the stair or elevator landing.
  • A two-way communication device at that landing.
  • Instructions and a monitored location the system calls.
  • The clear floor space for the wheelchair at the device.
  • Signage that identifies the refuge.

How do reviewers miss it?

The life safety plan hatches a refuge and the electrical drawings never show a device. Or the device is shown in the lobby, not at the landing the code requires.

Helonic pairs the hatch with the device note and marks a refuge that has no communication leg.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does an area of refuge need two-way communication?
Yes, when the IBC requires the area of refuge. Section 1009 calls for a two-way communication system at the landing, with instructions and a monitored answering point.
Where should the device show up on the drawings?
On the life safety plan at the refuge, and on the electrical or low-voltage drawings as a device. A hatch with no device is incomplete.
Is this the same as checking exit signs?
No. Exit signs and emergency lighting are on the life safety plan review. This page is only the refuge communication system.
What else fails at the refuge landing?
The wheelchair space is too small, the sign is missing, or the device is located off the landing. Those are drawing items a plan checker can see.
MG

Manas Gandhi

Co-founder & CTO, Helonic

Manas is the co-founder and CTO of Helonic, where he leads engineering and AI research for construction drawing analysis. He works directly with structural, MEP, civil, and fire protection engineers to translate the way they review drawings into AI systems that flag the issues that actually matter in the field. Before Helonic, he built machine learning pipelines for technical document understanding and has spent the last several years interviewing licensed design engineers and discipline leads to ground product decisions in real practice rather than industry assumptions.

Areas of focus
  • AI for technical document understanding
  • Cross-discipline coordination workflows
  • Code compliance automation (IBC, NEC, NFPA, IPC, IMC, ASCE)
  • Structural and MEP drawing review systems

How this page was researched: Communication requirements were checked against IBC Section 1009 for areas of refuge and the two-way communication system at the landing. Exit signs remain on the life safety drawing review so the pages do not share a query.

Last reviewed by Manas Gandhi · September 24, 2026

Check Refuges Against the Life Safety Sheet

Helonic compares life safety plans, stair details, and electrical notes for a refuge that has no communication device.