Helonic
Case Study

How Drawing Review Caught a Pipe Stack Clash on a Miami Custom Home

  • A main plumbing stack and an electrical subpanel with its trunk feeder were drawn in the same wall, and no BIM team or QA/QC pass existed to catch it.
  • Helonic, AI drawing review software, read the Miami home's PDF set and checked plumbing, electrical, and structure against each other, and found four more errors.
  • The builder resolved all five on paper and avoided an estimated $80,000+ in change orders.

Miami, FL. $80K+ in change orders avoided.

Lead Finding

Plumbing stack vs. electrical subpanel

Estimated Savings

$80K+ in change orders avoided

Project Setup

No BIM team, no QA/QC

5 Cross-Discipline Errors on a Miami Home With No BIM Team

A custom home builder was getting ready to build a single-family residence in the Miami area. The design came from several consultants, each delivering their own PDF sheets. There was no BIM team on the job, so nobody was building a federated model or running clash detection.

There was also no formal QA/QC process. Coordination between the plumbing and electrical sheets depended on someone noticing a conflict by eye while flipping between sheets. On a one-off custom home, that someone is usually the project manager, who is also running the schedule and the subs.

Custom homes don't repeat. There is no prototype that has already been built once, so every wall, chase, and equipment location is being coordinated for the first time.

Helonic Found a $20,000 Stack and Subpanel Clash in One Wall

The builder uploaded the full PDF set. Helonic read the plumbing, electrical, structural, and architectural sheets together and compared where each discipline put its equipment and routes.

The finding that mattered most was a main plumbing stack drawn in the same wall as an electrical subpanel and its trunk feeder. The plumbing plan and the electrical plan each worked on their own. Overlaid, the stack and the panel could not both be there.

Moving the stack was not a one-sheet fix. The plumber had to route the main through a completely different set of walls, which changed the branch runs to the fixtures it served and the framing those walls needed to carry the pipe.

The same run listed four other items a custom home can't absorb. Each one sat between two consultants' sheets, which is where a set with no formal QA/QC lets things through.

Impact window and door sizes. The window and door schedule listed impact-rated units at sizes that did not match the rough openings drawn on the elevations. In the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone, each unit has to be a product with its own Miami-Dade approval, and that approval covers specific sizes and anchoring. A unit ordered to the schedule would not fit the opening, and one built to the opening might not match anything that has an approval. Impact products are made to order, so the error shows up weeks after the order, when the opening is already framed. Estimated cost if found in the field: about $18,000 in reordered units and lost time.

Finished floor elevation. The architectural sheets set the finished floor at one elevation, and the site plan for the flood zone called for a different one. That number drives the slab, the stem walls, the door thresholds, the driveway slope, and how many steps lead to the entry. If it is wrong, the fix is not an edit to a note. It changes the pour and the grading, and it can hold up the permit until the flood-zone documents agree with the plans. Estimated cost if found after the slab work started: about $25,000 in rework to the pour and grading, plus the delay.

Beam over an open room. A beam on the structural sheets landed on a wall that the architectural plan showed as open great room. Either the wall exists and the room is not open, or the room is open and the beam has no support below it. The load path had two answers depending on which discipline you read. The builder had to decide which was intended before framing, because a column or a bearing wall in the middle of a great room changes the design. Estimated cost if found after framing: about $12,000 to re-engineer the support and reframe.

Pool equipment pad. The pool equipment pad appeared on the site plan, but its slab was not on the structural sheets and its power was not on the electrical sheets. The pump, heater, and controls still need a circuit, a disconnect, bonding, and ground-fault protection. Without them on the drawings, the pool sub and the electrician each assume the other has it, and the pad gets sorted out in the field after the main electrical work is done. Estimated cost as a field change: about $6,000 for the slab, the circuit, and a second trip from the electrician.

See custom residential drawing review, Florida plan review requirements, hurricane-resistant construction drawings, what clash detection does not catch, 2D clash detection, and the Boston campus building review.

$80,000+ in Change Orders Stopped on Paper

The builder had the designers move the stack and re-route the plumbing before any wall was framed. They priced the field version of that same change at more than $20,000: opening finished walls, re-running pipe, moving the panel or the trunk line, and paying for re-inspection and the days lost.

Added to the stack, the four other findings bring the estimate to more than $80,000 in change orders: $20,000 for the stack, $18,000 for the impact windows and doors, $25,000 for the floor elevation, $12,000 for the beam, and $6,000 for the pool pad.

The other four findings went back to the design team as RFIs with the sheet references already attached. The window schedule was corrected to match the openings, the floor elevation was reconciled with the flood-zone plan, the beam and the great room were settled before framing, and the pool pad got its slab and its circuit on the drawings.

Without a BIM team, the builder still had a cross-discipline check on the set. The review took the place of the QA/QC pass the project never had.

A set with no BIM team and no QA/QC is where these conflicts survive. Across 1,000+ drawing packages Helonic has reviewed, about 8 in 10 had at least one coordination conflict between disciplines. See what Helonic found across 1,000+ drawing reviews.

Florida Building Code HVHZ and Flood Rules Behind $43,000 of the Findings

Miami-Dade and Broward counties are the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone under the Florida Building Code. In the HVHZ, every impact window and door needs product approval, usually a Miami-Dade Notice of Acceptance, for the size and anchoring installed.

That is why the window schedule mismatch carried $18,000. An approval covers specific sizes. A unit ordered to the schedule that does not fit the framed opening cannot be trimmed to fit, so it gets reordered, and impact products are made to order.

The finished floor elevation comes from the flood zone on the FEMA flood map and the local floodplain rules, which often require freeboard above the base flood elevation. The architectural sheets and the site plan have to agree before the permit and the elevation certificate will. That mismatch carried the other $25,000.

The pool equipment pad falls under NEC Article 680, which covers pool pumps, heaters, bonding, and ground-fault protection. Those circuits have to be on the electrical sheets for the electrician to price and the inspector to check.

“We had no BIM team and nobody doing QA/QC. The plumbing stack and the subpanel were in the same wall, and I would have found that with the walls framed. Moving it then is a $20,000 problem. On paper it was a markup.”

Project Manager, Custom Home BuilderProject manager at the custom home builder, speaking after the five findings were resolved before framing.

Miami Custom Home Drawing Review: Questions and Answers

What was the main finding on the Miami custom home?

A main plumbing stack and an electrical subpanel with its trunk feeder were drawn in the same wall. The stack had to move, and the plumber had to route through a different set of walls.

How much did the stack conflict cost in the field?

The builder priced it at more than $20,000 as a change order if it had been found after the walls were framed.

What was the total estimated savings on this home?

More than $80,000 across five findings: about $20,000 for the plumbing stack, $18,000 for the impact windows and doors, $25,000 for the floor elevation, $12,000 for the beam, and $6,000 for the pool pad.

Why did this project need an outside check?

There was no BIM team and no formal QA/QC process. The consultants delivered separate PDF sheets, and nothing compared the disciplines against each other.

What other issues does Helonic find on a custom home?

On this set: impact window and door sizes that did not match the openings, a finished floor elevation that disagreed with the flood-zone site plan, a beam landing on a wall drawn as an open great room, and a pool equipment pad with no slab or power on the structural and electrical sheets.

What is the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone?

Miami-Dade and Broward counties under the Florida Building Code. Impact windows and doors there need product approval, usually a Miami-Dade Notice of Acceptance, for the exact size and anchoring installed.

Where does the finished floor elevation come from?

The flood zone on the FEMA flood map and the local floodplain rules, which often add freeboard above the base flood elevation. The architectural and site sheets have to use the same number.

What does a pool equipment pad need on the drawings?

A slab on the structural sheets, and circuits, disconnects, bonding, and ground-fault protection on the electrical sheets under NEC Article 680.

MS

Milind Sagaram

Co-founder & CEO, Helonic

Milind is the co-founder and CEO of Helonic, where he leads product and go-to-market for AI-powered construction drawing analysis. He works closely with general contractors, project managers, estimators, and owners to understand how drawing quality drives project outcomes - and where AI can reduce RFIs, change orders, and rework. Milind has interviewed hundreds of construction professionals across project delivery roles, from preconstruction estimators at ENR top-400 contractors to facilities directors at institutional owners, and uses those conversations to shape both product direction and the way Helonic talks about the work.

Areas of focus
  • Construction project delivery and preconstruction
  • RFI and change order economics
  • Owner and GC workflows for drawing QA/QC
  • Estimating risk and bid-stage scope assessment

How this page was researched: Reviewed against Helonic's 2026 drawing-analysis categories, RFI workflow, and product capabilities.

Last reviewed by Milind Sagaram · October 4, 2026

See what Helonic catches on your drawings

Upload your PDF set and we'll walk you through every coordination conflict, code gap, and dimension mismatch our AI flags.