Helonic

What to Review at 30, 60, and 90

Helonic is an AI construction drawing analysis platform for teams researching drawing review during drawing review. A 30 percent set needs scope and grids. Sixty percent needs systems. Ninety percent needs the issued-set conflicts that become RFIs.

Drawing ReviewSeptember 24, 2026

At 30 percent, review scope, grids, and the code strategy. At 60 percent, review systems and shafts. At 90 percent, review cross-discipline conflicts on the sheets that will be issued. Helonic runs that pass on the PDF in hand, so the comments match the milestone instead of a finished-set checklist applied too early.

What belongs in a 30 percent review?

The SD or 30 percent set is still choosing the building. Comments should hit occupancy, construction type, structural grid, floor-to-floor height, and major shafts. Detail-level clashes are noise at this stage because the ducts are not routed yet.

  • Occupancy and construction type called on the code sheet.
  • Structural grid that the plans can actually hold.
  • Floor-to-floor height versus the mechanical concept.
  • Egress widths that already fail the occupant load.

What changes at 60 and 90 percent?

At 60 percent the systems exist. Check shaft sizes, ceiling depths, equipment weights, and electrical room clearances. At 90 percent the set should be buildable. Check dimensions, spec conflicts, rated walls, and missing sheets.

Helonic compares the disciplines on that issue so a 90 percent comment cites a sheet, not a general worry about coordination.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should you review at 30 percent?
Scope, structural grid, floor-to-floor height, occupancy, construction type, and major shafts. Leave duct clashes for later. The building decisions that are expensive to reverse are already on the sheets.
What should you review at 60 percent?
System routing, shaft sizes, ceiling zones, equipment weights, and working clearances in electrical and mechanical rooms. The routes exist, so a conflict here is a real coordination item.
What should you review at 90 percent?
Cross-discipline conflicts, dimension strings, spec mismatches, fire-rated walls, and missing sheets. This is the pass that should look like an issued-set review.
Should the same checklist be used at every milestone?
Use the same categories, and change how hard you press them. A missing detail at 30 percent is expected. The same gap at 90 percent is an issue.
MG

Manas Gandhi

Co-founder & CTO, Helonic

Manas is the co-founder and CTO of Helonic, where he leads engineering and AI research for construction drawing analysis. He works directly with structural, MEP, civil, and fire protection engineers to translate the way they review drawings into AI systems that flag the issues that actually matter in the field. Before Helonic, he built machine learning pipelines for technical document understanding and has spent the last several years interviewing licensed design engineers and discipline leads to ground product decisions in real practice rather than industry assumptions.

Areas of focus
  • AI for technical document understanding
  • Cross-discipline coordination workflows
  • Code compliance automation (IBC, NEC, NFPA, IPC, IMC, ASCE)
  • Structural and MEP drawing review systems

How this page was researched: Milestone checks follow the typical SD, DD, and CD content architects issue at 30, 60, and 90 percent. Code items were checked against IBC Chapter 3 occupancy and Chapter 5 construction type, which are decidable before systems are routed.

Last reviewed by Manas Gandhi · September 24, 2026

Review the Set at the Milestone You Are In

Helonic reads the current PDF issue and flags the conflicts that belong at that milestone, instead of treating SD, DD, and CD as the same review.