How Drawing Review Caught 47 Stack Misses on a Denver Apartment
- Waste stacks on a 280-unit building missed the slab openings, and the same miss repeated on every floor.
- Helonic checked the PDF set for stack alignment and repeating units before the GMP.
- The team priced 47 stack misses at $210,000 and made the fix a condition of the GMP.
Denver, CO. $210K in estimated savings.
Issues Detected
620 in a 280-unit project
Estimated Savings
$210K in estimated savings
Key Focus
Stack misses, 188 locations
47 Stack Misses Repeated Across a 280-Unit Building
A developer's preconstruction team was reviewing a 280-unit, five-story multifamily building. One error in a typical unit repeats on every floor. A misaligned plumbing stack in one unit type becomes a field conflict in every copy of that unit.
The set had eight unit types, mirrored and stacked. Waste-stack locations on the plumbing plans did not line up with the slab penetrations on the structural plans for several types. Demising walls also cited different UL assembly numbers on different floors.
They had three weeks before the GMP. The estimator needed a count of coordination issues before the contingency was set.
Helonic Counted 188 Field Locations From 8 Unit Types
They uploaded the full set and focused on repeating units and stack alignment through all floors.
Helonic listed 620 issues. Forty-seven waste-stack centerlines on the plumbing plans missed the slab penetrations on the structural plans. Across the repeating types and five floors, that was 188 field conflicts that would have meant core drilling or a slab change.
Fire separation used three different UL numbers for the same demising wall on different floors, 34 inconsistencies in all. Mirrored units added 89 clashes at shared plumbing walls.
See multifamily drawing review, Colorado plan review requirements, how multifamily drawing sets get reviewed, fire-rated assembly coordination, stacking analysis, and the Portland apartment review.
$210,000 in Core Drilling Kept Out of the GMP
The 47 stack misalignments went into the GMP risk register at an estimated $210,000. That is the cost of core drilling five floors, rerouting waste lines, and re-inspecting firestopping at each penetration.
They made stack alignment a condition of the GMP, so the design team owned the core drilling instead of the contractor carrying it as contingency.
Once a typical unit was corrected, the same fix applied to every copy. Review after the correction covered eight unit types, not all 280 units.
Stack misses like these are conflicts between two disciplines. Across 1,000+ drawing packages Helonic has reviewed, about 8 in 10 had at least one coordination conflict between disciplines. See what Helonic found across 1,000+ drawing reviews.
IBC Fire Partitions and the 34 Demising Wall Inconsistencies in Denver
Denver permits buildings under the Denver Building and Fire Code, which adopts the International Building Code and International Fire Code with city amendments.
The IBC requires walls between dwelling units to be fire partitions. They are generally rated at one hour, with a half-hour rating allowed in some sprinklered construction types. Each wall is built to a tested assembly, usually a UL design number, and that number is what the inspector checks in the field.
That is why three UL numbers for one demising wall matter. The framer and the drywall crew build the assembly on the sheet in front of them. If two floors cite different designs, at least one of them is wrong, and the inspector finds it after the board is hung.
Every stack that crosses a rated floor also needs a tested firestop system. A stack that misses its slab opening gets cored, and the new hole needs its own firestopping and inspection. That is part of the $210,000.
“In multifamily, one plumbing stack error becomes 280 plumbing stack errors. Helonic found 47 misalignments across eight unit types before we locked the GMP. That's $210K we didn't have to bury in contingency.”
Denver Apartment Drawing Review: Questions and Answers
How does Helonic handle repeating unit types in multifamily projects?
It checks a unit type once, then counts how many floors and mirrored copies carry the same clash. On this project, 47 stack misses became 188 field locations.
Can Helonic verify plumbing stack alignment across floors?
Yes. It compares waste, vent, and water risers on the plumbing sheets with the slab penetrations on the structural sheets, and names the locations that do not line up.
Is Helonic useful during preconstruction specifically?
This team used the count to set GMP contingency and to require the design team to fix stack alignment and fire separation before the price was locked.
How does Helonic check fire separation between residential units?
It checks that demising walls and corridor walls use the same UL assembly, materials, and penetration details on every floor, including firestopping at plumbing and electrical penetrations.
What fire rating do walls between apartments need?
Under the International Building Code, walls between dwelling units are fire partitions, generally rated at one hour, with a half-hour rating allowed in some sprinklered construction types. Denver adopts the IBC with local amendments.
Why does a UL assembly number matter on the drawings?
It names the tested wall the crew has to build and the inspector has to check. Three numbers for one wall means at least two floors would be built to the wrong design.
Who paid for the stack fixes?
The developer made stack alignment a condition of the GMP, so the design team corrected it in the drawings instead of the contractor carrying core drilling as contingency.
Milind Sagaram
Co-founder & CEO, HelonicMilind is the co-founder and CEO of Helonic, where he leads product and go-to-market for AI-powered construction drawing analysis. He works closely with general contractors, project managers, estimators, and owners to understand how drawing quality drives project outcomes - and where AI can reduce RFIs, change orders, and rework. Milind has interviewed hundreds of construction professionals across project delivery roles, from preconstruction estimators at ENR top-400 contractors to facilities directors at institutional owners, and uses those conversations to shape both product direction and the way Helonic talks about the work.
- Construction project delivery and preconstruction
- RFI and change order economics
- Owner and GC workflows for drawing QA/QC
- Estimating risk and bid-stage scope assessment
How this page was researched: Reviewed against Helonic's 2026 drawing-analysis categories, RFI workflow, and product capabilities.
Last reviewed by Milind Sagaram · September 24, 2026